Clinicians' judgments of clinical utility: a comparison of the DSM-IV and five-factor models.
| Author | |
|---|---|
| Abstract | :  Clinical utility, or the usefulness of a diagnostic system in clinical practice, has been identified as an important construct in proposed revisions to the diagnostic nomenclature and a significant limitation of dimensional models of personality disorder, such as the 5-factor model (FFM). Only 1 study to date has addressed explicitly the clinical utility of the FFM, and the findings suggested significant limitations. In the current study, 245 practicing psychologists described 3 historic cases using both the FFM and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) and then rated each model on 6 aspects of clinical utility. In contrast to prior research, the psychologists in this study considered the FFM to have greater clinical utility than the existing diagnostic categories. | 
| Year of Publication | :  2006 | 
| Journal | :  Journal of abnormal psychology | 
| Volume | :  115 | 
| Issue | :  2 | 
| Number of Pages | :  298-308 | 
| ISSN Number | :  0021-843X | 
| URL | :  http://content.apa.org/journals/abn/115/2/298 | 
| DOI | :  10.1037/0021-843X.115.2.298 | 
| Short Title | :  J Abnorm Psychol | 
| Download citation | 
